Is it still possible to follow the Tantric pathway together?
November 22, 2008 by Al Link
Filed under Questions and Answers
Your materials on the Sexy Spiritual Relationships Membership website, all indicate that monogamy is preferable with the Tantric way. I would like to know, if that is not the desire of one or the other of the partners, is it still possible to follow the Tantric pathway together?
ANSWER
On the other hand, there are many Tantricas (practitioners of Tantric sacred sexuality) that do not make fidelity and monogamy a part of their practice. There is a long tradition in Tantra of having multiple sexual partners, including group sex. Some have obviously found value in those practices, but we do not. Naturally we can only teach what we know and what we actually practice ourselves. But we would never claim that the approach we take to sacred sexuality is the only approach or the only truth, or the only path that works. These are choices and decisions each individual and each couple must make.
It does pose a difficult challenge when one of the partners desires fidelity and monogamy but the other one wants a more open relationship sexually. In such a case each must look carefully at how important their position on this matter is to them. The crucial question is this: “Can I really expect to be happy (enduringly happy for a lifetime together) with a partner when we disagree on this, and can our relationship really thrive under such conditions?” If not, then you must find different partners. It is obviously easiest if you can both agree to make a commitment of fidelity in a monogamous relationship, or both agree on having a sexually open relationship.
Popularity: 3% [?]

Have a question about something you don’t want to ask anyone else or feel you can’t? It doesn’t have to be an embarrassing question though. Maybe you just have a relationship issue that you need to bounce off someone else. We are here for you. We are happy to hear from you and will do our best to address your question in a timely fashion.







